Pix: ACC John Onoja Attah, Commander, NSCDC Mining Marshals <\/p>\n\n\n\n
By Isiaka Mustapha, Editor-in-Chief, People’s Security Monitor <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Mining Marshals have defended the continued closure of the Stone Rockers quarry site in Abuja, insisting that the facility remains a crime scene in an ongoing criminal prosecution and cannot be reopened pending the determination of the case before the Federal High Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The clarification comes days after Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited petitioned President Bola Tinubu and key government officials over the 13-month shutdown of its operations, alleging that the action was unlawful and unsupported by any court order. The company’s claims have received widespread media attention in recent days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Responding to the allegations, the Commander of the Mining Marshals said the quarry was sealed not as an administrative sanction but because it constitutes the locus criminis in a criminal matter currently before the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to him, Stone Rockers and its director, Mr. Kolawole Olaiya, are standing trial in Charge No. FHC\/ABM\/VR\/338\/2026 over allegations of illegal mining activities within a mineral title area legally belonging to Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Commander explained that the prosecution followed extensive investigations triggered by a series of petitions submitted by the complainant company over a period of more than one year. The petitions were subsequently referred by the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Minister of Interior to the Mining Marshals through the Commandant General of Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps for investigation and prosecution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He disclosed that investigators arrested the defendants at coordinates identified as longitude 7\u00b017’24″E and latitude 8\u00b052’11″N, which, according to findings by the Mining Marshals, fall within Mining Lease No. 000395 ML belonging to Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To support the claim, the agency cited a letter dated January 23, 2026 from the Mining Cadastre Office, which reportedly confirmed that the disputed coordinates are located within the complainant’s licensed mining area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Mining Marshals further revealed that part of the evidence to be tendered before the court includes correspondence allegedly written by a member of the defence team, Mohammed Olanrewaju Jibril, during the investigation phase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to the Commander, the letter, dated August 12, 2025 and allegedly written on the instructions of the defendants, contains admissions relevant to the allegations now before the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He maintained that the prosecution’s case extends beyond the disputed coordinates and correspondence, describing the documentary evidence assembled during the investigation as substantial and difficult to controvert.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The agency also questioned what it described as attempts by the defendants to seek administrative intervention while criminal and civil proceedings relating to the dispute remain before the courts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“The issues raised by the defendants are already the subject of judicial proceedings,” the Commander said, warning against actions capable of undermining or prejudicing the ongoing cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He further alleged that the defendants were pursuing “every extrajudicial means” to frustrate the criminal proceedings and argued that their latest petition to the President did not merit official consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to him, the petition formed part of a broader effort to shape public opinion after what he described as unsuccessful attempts to harass him through petitions to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Commander maintained that neither public campaigns nor institutional pressure would deter the Mining Marshals from pursuing the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“No matter the level of blackmail and harassment deployed by illegal mining and erring industry players, the Mining Marshals will not be deterred from ensuring that the full weight of the law is pressed very tightly against everyone who breaks the laws in the Nigerian mining sector,” he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He also appealed to media organisations to strengthen editorial gatekeeping processes to ensure that reports lacking sufficient merit or verification do not gain traction in the public domain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to him, the media remains a critical stakeholder in the Federal Government’s ongoing reforms in the solid minerals sector and has an important role to play in supporting lawful and responsible mining practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the status of workers initially arrested during enforcement operations, the Mining Marshals said prosecutors had earlier amended the charge to exclude them on the grounds that they acted as employees of a disclosed principal and might not possess the criminal intent required for prosecution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, the agency said recent developments, including the participation of some workers in protests over the shutdown, have prompted a review of that decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Commander disclosed that prosecutors have now been directed to consider relisting the affected workers in the criminal proceedings if evidence establishes a greater level of involvement in the alleged illegal mining activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Mining Marshals also rejected allegations that enforcement actions were influenced by financial inducement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to the agency, the complainant company had repeatedly complained about financial losses arising from its inability to commence operations due to the alleged encroachment but had not provided any financial support or logistics to the Mining Marshals for the operation that resulted in the arrests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Commander stressed that enforcement decisions were based solely on evidence gathered during investigations and not on the financial status of either party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to combating illegal mining and protecting legitimate mineral title holders, insisting that no amount of pressure, publicity or alleged blackmail would deter it from pursuing violators of the nation’s mining laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The dispute between Stone Rockers and Lord’s Career Ventures has generated multiple legal proceedings and competing public narratives, with Stone Rockers maintaining that its closure was unlawful while the Mining Marshals insist that the matter is now firmly before the courts for determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Mining Marshals have justified the continued closure of the Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited quarry site in Abuja, stating that the facility remains a crime scene in an ongoing criminal prosecution and cannot be reopened until the court concludes proceedings.
The agency’s position follows recent petitions by Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and other senior government officials over the 13-month suspension of its operations. The company had alleged that the closure was unlawful and not backed by any court order.
However, the Commander of the Mining Marshals maintained that the quarry was not sealed as an administrative punishment but as part of a criminal investigation and prosecution currently before the Federal High Court.
According to the Commander, Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited and its director, Mr. Kolawole Olaiya, are being prosecuted in Charge No. FHC\/ABM\/VR\/338\/2026 over allegations of illegal mining activities within a mineral title area legally owned by Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited.
He explained that the prosecution followed extensive investigations initiated after several petitions were submitted by the complainant company over a period exceeding one year. The petitions were subsequently forwarded by the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Minister of Interior through the Commandant General of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) for investigation and appropriate legal action.
The Commander disclosed that investigators arrested the defendants at coordinates identified as longitude 7\u00b017’24″E and latitude 8\u00b052’11″N, which the Mining Marshals’ investigation established as falling within Mining Lease No. 000395 ML belonging to Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited.
As part of the evidence supporting the prosecution, the agency referenced a letter dated January 23, 2026, from the Mining Cadastre Office, which reportedly confirmed that the disputed location lies within the licensed mining area of the complainant.
The Mining Marshals further revealed that documentary evidence to be presented before the court includes correspondence allegedly authored by a member of the defence team, Mohammed Olanrewaju Jibril, during the course of the investigation.
According to the Commander, the letter dated August 12, 2025, and allegedly written on the instruction of the defendants, contains information considered relevant to the charges currently before the court.
He stressed that the prosecution’s case is supported by substantial documentary and investigative evidence, which he described as compelling and capable of establishing the allegations before the court.
The Commander questioned attempts by the defendants to seek administrative intervention while both criminal and civil matters arising from the dispute remain pending before competent courts.
He noted that the issues raised in the company’s petitions are already subjects of judicial determination and cautioned against actions capable of interfering with or prejudicing ongoing proceedings.
According to him, the latest petition to the President forms part of a broader effort to influence public opinion despite the matter being before the court. He also alleged that previous petitions filed against him with the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) failed to undermine the prosecution.
Reaffirming the agency’s resolve, the Commander stated that the Mining Marshals would not be distracted from enforcing mining laws and protecting legitimate mineral title holders.
“No matter the level of blackmail, intimidation or pressure from illegal mining operators and erring industry players, the Mining Marshals will remain committed to ensuring that offenders face the full weight of the law,” he said.
He also urged media organisations to strengthen editorial verification processes and ensure that reports relating to ongoing investigations and court matters are subjected to proper scrutiny before publication.
According to him, the media remains an important partner in supporting the Federal Government’s reforms in the solid minerals sector and promoting responsible mining practices across the country.
On the status of workers earlier arrested during enforcement operations, the Mining Marshals explained that prosecutors had initially amended the charges to exclude them because they were employees acting on behalf of a disclosed principal and might not possess the criminal intent required for prosecution.
However, the agency disclosed that recent developments have prompted a review of that decision, with prosecutors directed to examine whether available evidence justifies relisting some of the workers in the criminal proceedings.
The Mining Marshals also dismissed allegations that their enforcement actions were influenced by financial inducements.
According to the agency, although the complainant company had repeatedly complained of losses arising from its inability to commence operations due to the alleged encroachment, it did not provide financial support or logistics for the operation that led to the arrests and prosecution.
The Commander emphasized that all enforcement actions were based strictly on evidence uncovered during investigations and not on the financial standing of any party involved in the dispute.
He reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to combating illegal mining, safeguarding legitimate mineral rights holders, and ensuring strict compliance with Nigeria’s mining laws.
The dispute between Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited and Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited has generated multiple legal proceedings and competing public narratives. While Stone Rockers maintains that the closure of its quarry is unlawful, the Mining Marshals insist that the matter is now before the courts and that the judicial process must be allowed to run its full course.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pix: ACC John Onoja Attah, Commander, NSCDC Mining Marshals By Isiaka Mustapha, Editor-in-Chief, People’s Security Monitor The Mining Marshals have defended the continued closure of the Stone Rockers quarry site…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":27752,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pages"],"yoast_head":"\n